Journal Club: Additional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system anomalies: a systematic review of the literature
Authors: A. C. ROSSI and F. PREFUMO
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2014; 44: 388–393
Objectives: To analyze literature on the additional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in assessing central nervous system (CNS) anomalies suspected by ultrasound.
Methods: A search was performed of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library and the reference lists of identified
articles. Inclusion criteria were CNS anomalies suspected/diagnosed by ultrasound, MRI performed after Ultrasound, and postmortem examination by autopsy or postnatal assessment. MOOSE guidelines were followed.
Outcomes assessed were positive/negative agreement between ultrasound and MRI, additional information provided by MRI, and discordance between ultrasound and MRI. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of MRI were calculated using the DerSimonian–Laird method. Postnatal/ postmortem examinations were used as the reference standard.
Results: We identified thirteen articles which included 710 fetuses undergoing both ultrasound and MRI. MRI confirmed ultrasound-positive findings in 65.4% of fetuses and provided additional information in 22.1%. MRI disclosed CNS anomalies in 18.4% of fetuses. In 2.0% of cases, ultrasound was more accurate than MRI. In 30% of fetuses, MRI was so different from ultrasound that the clinical management changed. Agreement was observed mainly for ventriculomegaly (51.3%). Disagreement was noted mainly for midline anomalies (48.6%). Pooled sensitivity of MRI was 97% (95% CI, 95–98%) and pooled specificity was 70% (95% CI, 58–81%).
Conclusions MRI supplements the information provided by ultrasound. It should be considered in selected fetuses
with CNS anomalies suspected on ultrasound.